Nyman Media vs Goodie.
Goodie monitors how AI search engines and assistants describe your brand, surfacing prompt-level performance and competitive share.
Goodie watches the AI answer layer: does the LLM mention your brand, what does it say, who else does it mention. Nyman Media watches the input side: does your site make it easy for those LLMs to extract correct information about your brand in the first place.
These are sequential, not competing. We're cheaper because the diagnosis is cheaper to deliver than ongoing prompt-level tracking. And we're public-by-default because AI-readiness scores ought to be transparent the way Lighthouse perf scores are.
| feature | nyman media | goodie |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | Whether AI search engines can crawl and parse your site correctly | What AI search engines say about your brand |
| Free tier | Yes: 1 audit/day, no signup | Trial / demo |
| Pricing | $19/mo, self-serve | Sales-led pricing |
| Multi-LLM brand tracking | No | Yes |
| Public, indexable per-domain audit | Yes | No |
| Developer / CI surface | REST + CLI + MCP, exit-code deploy gates | Web app |
- ›You need brand-mention tracking and competitor analysis at a prompt level
- ›Your team is set up for ongoing AI-search monitoring as a discipline
- ›You haven't audited the technical / structural side of AI-readiness yet
- ›You want a free, friction-free first audit + a public certificate
- ›You ship code and want AI-readiness as a CI gate or an MCP tool
If your team has the budget for both, that's the right answer. Fix the input side with us, then measure the output side with Goodie. If you can only do one right now, run a free audit here first. There's no point tracking citation share for a site AI crawlers can't reach.